There aren't many times in your life that you can sit there with raised eyebrows and think: what the hell? But that is exactly what I thought when I found out that J K Rowling had released a book under a different pen name and had taken every step possible to hide it. Well she almost too every step possible - she did tell the snitch after all it was her book.
But there are important publishing lessons that we can learn from this and here are six of them.
1. Publishers choose marketable rather than well written
As soon as it was announced that J K Rowling was the author, some of the big publishers admitted that they had turned down the book from who they thought was an unknown author. Interestingly their reason was not based on writing style, storyline or any technical aspect of writing. It was because they didn't think they could market it. This angers me slightly. How are we supposed to teach our children what is good writing or what is a good storyline if quality books aren't being produced because mummy porn is more attractive to market? If we removed the poor quality books from the shelve that are produced because people buy them (and sometimes they only do so because they want to see how horrible they are really) then perhaps people would buy quality writing.
2. The biggest marketing asset is your brand
The book in question had only sold about 1500 copies and was by no means a best seller despite good reviews. However as soon as the real author had been revealed but the book sold out and was number one on Amazon. Why? Because J K Rowling had written it. The name is associated with quality story lines and therefore people will buy her books. Therefore you should utilize your name and not your books.
3. Publishers aren't very good at marketing
Honestly, if the book sold only 1500 books with the publishers doing all they were willing to do to market it, it shows that while they will get books to the reader's shops, they won't get the books to the reader's home.
4. Readers care about you not your genre
The Cuckoo's Calling is hardly Harry Potter related in terms of story or genre and yet J K Rowling's fans wanted to buy it. There has long been an argument that you might consider pen names for different genres, yet this is evidence that isn't the case. Readers will buy your books because of you, not because of your genre.
5. You should keep trade secrets to your trusted circles
I'm sorry to say but J K Rowling made one mistake at keeping this a secret. She trusted someone that she couldn't possibly really trust 100%. Book publishing is a business and like with any business you need trade secrets to a need to know basis. It is unlikely that J K Rowling stuck to this principal.
6. Twitter is great for reporters
You're laughing I bet. But considering that the partner at Russells shared the news with his wife who then shared the news with a journalist on Twitter. So what can we learn from this? Be careful what you say on Twitter - you never know what paper is listening.
I hope you have enjoyed this article. I hope that you take the time to follow me on Twitter or Facebook.
D J Lowbridge's personal blog for sharing news about his writing, articles he has written around the web and some of his interests (including crabbing)
Friday, 19 July 2013
Wednesday, 17 July 2013
Six Social Media Blunders and what we can learn from them
Social media is incredibly powerful –
it can keep us all in contact with friends and family, market our books and
lose us great opportunities. Yes that is right you read the last part
correctly. Social media can be as much a pain as a gain. Here are six social
media blunders that have cost people dearly and what we can learn from them.
Connor Riley had a job offer from
Cisco when she tweeted – “Cisco just
offered me a job! Now I have to weigh the utility of a fatty paycheck against
the daily commute to San Jose and hating the work.”
Shortly afterwards Cisco employee
gave a tweet back - “Who is the hiring manager? I’m sure they would love to
know that you will hate the work. We here at Cisco are versed in the Web.”
But if that wasn’t enough, she was
soon the target of several internet trolls that called her names that would upset even
the thickest skinned of us. It is likely it will be a long time before the “fatty
Cisco” incident is forgotten forever.
Lesson learned: If want to say
anything that could be construed as negative, use privacy functions that limit
who see it – or better keep it to yourself and don’t say it at all.
You can’t control hastags and if we
have learnt anything with social media is that people who really want to promote negative
aspects of your brand - will. With McDonalds they wanted people to share their
positive experiences in their restaurants – however consumers quickly did the
exact opposite.
Lesson learned: Use hashtags that
can’t be turned into negative aspects about you.
Waitress Ashley Johnson decided to
take her frustration out on Facebook after she didn’t receive the tip she expected
from two customers. She took the extraordinary step of mentioning the restaurant
by name. Unfortunately her bosses discovered the update and she was sacked for “speaking
disparagingly about customers and casting the restaurant in a bad light on a
social network.”
Lesson learned: Be careful what you
say about customers online. You never know who is reading.
Teacher Ashley Payne was forced to
resign after she posted a photo online of her out drinking. Someone obviously
took offense to the message as the head of her school was e-mailed with a copy
of the photo.
Lesson learned: If you are in a
public facing position (even if you don’t realize / advertise it) keep your
social media profiles professional. If something is deemed unsuitable for your
main audience someone will let you know one way or another.
Read the exchange and you’ll see why
it was a blunder.
Lesson learned: Where to start? I
think the important points to take away are remember who you add onto Facebook,
don’t write negative comments and be honest.
Back in 2009 Habitat sent out a
number of tweets that contained popular and trending hashtags that had limited
if anything to do with the message. The crisis exploded later on when they took
advantage of events happening in Iran at the time. Habitat later apologized and
stated the hashtags were not authorised.
Lesson learned: Use meaningful
related hashtags not just any that are trending.
I hope you have found this article
useful. If you have any more examples please let us know in the comments below.
Monday, 15 July 2013
The Six Reasons Why You Should Not Spam in the Self Publishing World
There is a lot of spamming in self
publishing. A day doesn’t go by that I don’t receive an e-mail, a direct
message, a tweet, a message on a group or in private message about someone
wanting to sell me something. It can be anything from editing services and
cover art to their own book. But it is best not to sell in such methods. Here
are six reasons why it is a bad idea to spam people about any product in the
self publishing world.
1.
It creates negative emotions in most people
Marketing strategies that include
spamming are normally only 1% effective. At most spamming is only about 3-4% effective.
The rest are either neutral or negative. In a world where negative word of
mouth can spread like wildfire it is often best to avoid methods which will
garner any kind of negative emotion.
2.
It loses you connections
This is the major one. If you DM me
or PM me I am likely to block you. Doing so will lose you any chance of letting
me know about your book or services in the future. Losing one customer may not
seem bad but remember it is future long term relationships that you want to
build. You may lose one sale immediately, but you could have lost dozens of sales
from one customer by being pushing.
3.
Publishing isn’t about being pushy
The publishing industry has never
been about pushy salesmen. Think about it. Do you walk into a shop and suddenly
a group of customer assistants jump on you to buy a book? No normally you left
alone to wonder the shelves and choose the book yourself. That is because
reading a book is personal it should be totally up to you.
4.
You destroys your creditability
The funniest thing I think I’ve ever
had was an e-mail from a person trying to sell me a book on how to make money
from selling without spamming. Now if you are spamming me about a book on how
not to spam how serious am I going to take it? But if you have to spam to get
sales anyway what does it say about your book? Is that it is so bad you have to
rely on throwing people at your book and hoping some of them will stick?
Creditability is important in publishing – make sure you have it.
5.
You should concentrate more on fans than on
sales
A simple line I like to say – a sale
is for a day, a fan is for life. Sales are only worth 30-70% of the list price
for that one book. A fan is worth a lot more. They will market your book for
you, they will buy all your books, they will make you feel successful.
Concentrate on getting fans not sales.
6.
There are more cost effective, time efficient
methods
Spamming is time consuming. Posting
hundreds of e-mails, tweets, direct messages and such is time consuming. You
have to identify the targets, write the messages and send. Whereas you could
spend the same amount of time writing a good content rich blog post that will
encourage people to look at your services.
So here I wish to ask about what you
think. What are the best methods of promotion? What do you think of spamming?
Please sign up at my Facebook page or follow me on Twitter to get the latest articles quicker.
Friday, 12 July 2013
Six things not to do on Twitter
Twitter is one of the biggest social
media platforms out there. Everyday articles are posted, shared and talked
about. With everything that is put out there and all there is little wonder
that people make mistakes. But few people understand that Twitter is also an
advertising platform. Everything you push on Twitter says something about you
and your brand. So if you do make a mistake it can make a dent in your
publishing career. So here are six things not to do on Twitter...
1.
Don’t comment on an article without reading it
There are those that comment solely based on the title or first line of a tweet. People can tell if you haven’t read
the article you are commenting on. Sometimes titles can be misleading or the article has a secret message. Read the articles not just the tweets. It looks unprofessional and it will cost
your reputation.
It is also advisable to make sure that you aren't making the same point if you want to debate a topic. It will look silly if aren't adding to the conversation but debating for the sake of it.
It is also advisable to make sure that you aren't making the same point if you want to debate a topic. It will look silly if aren't adding to the conversation but debating for the sake of it.
2.
Don’t DM people for articles / products
I don’t really want to go over this
again – but it seems people do not understand. In fact I now get more DMs than
I did before. So I will just link here to my original article for you to read.
3.
Don’t acknowledge those who share your news
People just forget their please and
thank you when people share their tweets. If you can remember to do that it
shows that you are caring person who is mindful of the people who help them.
4.
Spam
Spamming is ineffective. It is as
simple as that. I’ve written about it before for Facebook groups but the
message is very useful for Twitter as well.
5.
Directly insult other authors
It is unprofessional to say something nasty to
people on social media. Don’t show your nasty side and stay polite with all
conversation.
6.
Don’t expect everything for nothing
I hope you have enjoyed this blog post. Please feel free to leave a comment.
Please sign up at my Facebook page or follow me on Twitter to get the latest articles quicker.
Labels:
advice,
author,
behaviour,
D J Lowbridge,
David Lowbridge,
e-book,
ebook,
ebooks,
marketing,
promotion,
reading,
review,
reviewing,
self publishing,
social media,
trolls,
twitter,
writing tips
Wednesday, 10 July 2013
Why online retailers needs to change their review policy
It is no secret that I am someone
who loves reviews and reviewing. I‘ve already written a couple of review centric
posts on my blog:
Six Reasons Why Reviewing Is Good
Six Differences between a Bad Review and a Troll Attack
Six Reasons Why Reviewing Is Good
Six Differences between a Bad Review and a Troll Attack
On each one I have made clear that I
feel that reviews should solve one purpose. To give honest, critical feedback
on the experiences of the product as it was intended to be used.
Last year Amazon decided to delete hundreds (if not thousands) of reviews written by other known authors. Very little explanation was given though some sources claimed they had financial connections to the books they reviewed.
Last year Amazon decided to delete hundreds (if not thousands) of reviews written by other known authors. Very little explanation was given though some sources claimed they had financial connections to the books they reviewed.
Interestingly a few of mine had
disappeared and I will admit that I do have a financial connection to the books
I reviewed – I am part of the Amazon affiliate program.
In contrast to a lot of people who
review, I take it very seriously and am proud of what I publish. My reviews give
an overview of my experiences with the product from their intended use. For
example a recent one, that is not part of the affiliate system and amazingly
has stayed thus far.
But there are many reviews out there
that aren’t giving constructive feedback. Take some of the reviews on Fifty
Shades of Grey. It didn’t take me long to find these five star reviews on
Amazon.
And even one star reviews have some
poor reviews among them.
I don’t agree with either set of reviews
and I think Amazon and other retailers need to consider what they publish on
their sites. It took me just two pages to find three usable examples of poor five
star reviews. I could have used others if they weren’t so long that they wouldn’t
fit on the web browser in one shot. Yet it took ten pages to find those two one
star reviews. That suggests that these fake reviews are artificially inflating
the overall score of the book. How many other products out there have fake
reviews? Read this blog post as a clue on the subject.
Amazon would have you believe that
they deleted the fake reviews last year, but they were rather inconsistent. I
have just shown you five reviews that seem to go against the principles of reviewing
and could post many more. Why are these posts that are not honestly talking
about the book be included?
If it is this attitude to reviews; is there any value to them?
I seems online retailers have very little control which reviews are posted online. Which is why troll attacks can and do happen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


